Deadly Allergy

Investigating causes and cures of anaphylaxis

  • News
  • Science
  • Resources
    • Airborne / Contact Allergy
    • They know …..
    • Iatrogenesis
  • History
  • Treatments
  • PENTA Project
  • Contact Us

Category Archives: News

COVID-19 Vaccine

9th December, 2020 · admin

Scroll down for Anaphylaxis/COVID 19 news stories and reports

See the Science page for medical journal articles re: COVID-19 vaccines and anaphylaxis.


Access to Information emails describing anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines in British Columbia (pdf)


Hypertensive Anaphylaxis After Moderna COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report


 

COVID-19 Vaccination Results in Wide Array of Skin Disorders – Rashes Are More Common in People with Baseline Medical Problems – Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™

 

UK warns people with serious allergies to avoid Pfizer vaccine after two adverse reactions

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-britain-vaccine/uk-warns-people-with-serious-allergies-to-avoid-pfizer-vaccine-idUSKBN28J1DX
LONDON (Reuters) – “Britain’s medicine regulator has advised that people with a history of significant allergies do not get Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine after two people reported severe adverse reactions on the first day of rollout.

…

Pfizer has said people with a history of severe adverse allergic reactions to vaccines or the candidate’s ingredients were excluded from their late stage trials, which is reflected in the MHRA’s emergency approval protocol.

The new MHRA guidance, sent out to health professionals, said a much broader segment should not take the vaccine.

“Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine,” it said.

It also said resuscitation facilities should be available for all vaccinations.”

UPDATE – UK walks back Food Allergy Warning

U.K. to refine allergy warning on Pfizer vaccine sparked by two adverse reactions – The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) initially advised anyone with “a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food” to avoid taking the vaccine. However, by the end of Wednesday that guidance was set to be refined after discussions with experts on the nature of the reactions. ‘We’re tweaking advice to make it very clear that if you’ve got a food allergy, you’re not more at risk,’ Imperial College London’s Paul Turner, an expert in allergy and immunology who has been advising the MHRA on their revised guidance, told Reuters.”

Video from Reuters here:


#CanWeTalkAboutIt
July 21 severe systemic allergic reaction anaphylaxis 1st dose Az #vaccineinjuries pic.twitter.com/79oDlRSKk2

— Nik (@Manxie1989) June 14, 2022

RFK, Jr. Warned FDA Three Months Ago About Ingredient in Pfizer COVID Vaccine That Likely Caused Life-Threatening Reaction in Two UK Healthcare Workers – An investigation this week identified polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the likely reason two people in the UK suffered anaphylaxis after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. In September, CHD Chairman RFK, Jr. warned the FDA that PEG in COVID vaccines could lead to severe allergic reactions. By Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN

5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccines – As reports surfaced today of yet another healthcare worker who suffered a severe allergic reaction to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, it’s time the FDA and Fauci explain what they plan to do about it. By Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN

FDA Investigates Allergic Reactions to Pfizer COVID Vaccine After More Healthcare Workers Hospitalized – The FDA is investigating allergic reactions in “multiple states.” The agency acknowledged the reactions may have been caused by PEG, a compound in the Pfizer vaccine that CHD previously told the FDA could put millions of people at risk. – Children’s Health Defense Team

Comment from Vinu Arumugham – Posted by the Food and Drug Administration on Dec 8, 2020
“The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine increases risk of developing de novo asthma or exacerbation of existing asthma (and allergies, GI diseases). All vaccines are contaminated with aeroallergens thus increasing risk of developing asthma. The Pfizer vaccine is distributed in a multi-dose vial which needs to be diluted. This step along with the “pressure equalization” step further increases risk of aeroallergen contamination of the vaccine. Since it is also known that the vaccine has high reactogenicity, it will cause a strong undesirable immune response against these aeroallergens. One can expect increase in asthma and aeroallergen related allergies following this vaccine. And the two dose requirement, will boost the asthma and allergies too.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf

Aeroallergen contamination of multi-dose and reconstituted vaccine vials cause the development of asthma, gastrointestinal diseases and proves vaccine makers and vaccine safety regulators are incompetent
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2544037”


Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: Health Canada recommendations for people with serious allergies – Advisory from the Government of Canada – “What to do: People with allergies to any of the ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID 19 vaccine should not receive it. Speak with your health professional about any serious allergies or other health conditions you may have before you receive this vaccine.”

Anaphylaxis Following m-RNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt (pdf) – December 19, 2020 – CDC.gov


Alaska healthcare worker with no history of drug allergies suffered serious ‘anaphylactic-like’ reaction after getting Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine – A healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered a severe allergic reaction within 10 minutes of receiving Pfizer Inc’s coronavirus vaccine on Tuesday – She remains stable in the ICU and is expected to be discharged later on Wednesday – The woman has no known history of allergies and is said to be disappointed that she can’t receive the vaccine’s second dose – The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered – It led the U.K.’s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine – In Pfizer’s clinical trial, 137 people who were given the vaccine suffered allergic reactions as did 111 in the placebo group – December 16, 2020


Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions – Sciencemag.org – “Severe allergy-like reactions in at least eight people who received the COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer and BioNTech over the past 2 weeks may be due to a compound in the packaging of the messenger RNA (mRNA) that forms the vaccine’s main ingredient, scientists say. A similar mRNA vaccine developed by Moderna, which was authorized for emergency use in the United States on Friday, also contains the compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG).”


Hamilton PSW says allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccine led to fainting, seizures and CPR – Deborah Tilli says she still thinks people should get the vaccine – CBC – “”I do have a severe allergy to bumblebees, and the nurse went over that with me and even questioned me about it, but … it seemed like she really didn’t know what she was doing,” Tilli said. … Tilli says when she woke up, she was told she suffered seizures and needed CPR for a brief period. She doesn’t remember much during the reaction, but says one moment sticks out — accepting the fact that she could die. ‘There was a moment where, I don’t want to say I gave up, but I was just like ‘It is what it is.’ … [Days later] when I was in bed the other night, I was thinking, ‘What if I left my two girls without a mother?’ Tilli said.”


2 North Dakotans have allergic reaction suspected from COVID-19 vaccine; infectious disease specialist says ‘don’t be alarmed’ – KXNET.com


Oregon health care worker hospitalized after severe reaction to coronavirus vaccine – KATU2.com – “An employee at a northeastern Oregon hospital had a severe allergic reaction to the Moderna vaccine and was hospitalized, the Oregon Health Authority reported Thursday. The employee works at Wallowa Memorial Hospital in Wallowa County. After taking the vaccine this week, OHA said the employee experienced anaphylaxis. OHA said the employee is recovering in the hospital.”


Boston doctor has severe allergic reaction after receiving Moderna jab – Daily Mail via MSN.com – “A doctor from Boston with an allergy to shellfish suffered a serious reaction after receiving the Moderna coronavirus vaccine. Dr. Hossein Sadrzadeh, who works as geriatric oncologist at Boston Medical Center, became dizzy and experienced an increased heart rate after he took the jab on Christmas Eve.”


Maine health care worker experienced severe allergic reaction to coronavirus vaccine, CDC reports – MSN.com – “The Maine Med employee had a history of severe allergies and past experience with anaphylaxis, which can cause a widespread rash and swelling, plummeting blood pressure, rapid heartbeat, and difficulty breathing. Hospital staff at the vaccination clinic were briefed on the employee’s medical history and observed the person after being vaccinated, as with all COVID-19 inoculations, according to the Portland Press-Herald.”


NYC health care worker has city’s first allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccine – New York Post – “A New York City health care worker suffered a “significant allergic reaction” to a COVID-19 vaccine — the first “serious adverse event” to the jab in the Big Apple, officials said Wednesday.”


Alabama health officials verify allergic reaction to COVID vaccine – WTOK.com – “The Alabama Department of Public Health reported Wednesday that it was notified that a person who received the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine Tuesday experienced anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction) several minutes after taking the vaccine and while in required post-vaccine observation. The patient was immediately treated with anaphylaxis protocol at Decatur Morgan Hospital where the vaccine was administered.”


Mexican Doctor Taken to ICU After Experiencing Serious Reaction to Pfizer Vaccine – The female Mexican doctor experienced seizures, difficulty in breathing and developed skin rashes after she took the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. – “The female doctor suffered from seizures and had difficulty in breathing besides developing skin rashes. The Mexican Health Ministry said in a statement that the initial diagnosis revealed that it was encephalomyelitis, which is an inflammation of the brain and spinal cord.”


CDC says severe allergic reactions to the Covid vaccine run 10 times reactions to the flu shot but they’re still rare – CNBC – “A new CDC study published Wednesday found that people receiving Covid-19 vaccines experience anaphylaxis at a rate 10 times higher compared with the flu vaccine.” – Link to study.


Scientist Calls for Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Sensitivity Patch Testing Prior to COVID19 Vaccine and Drug Use – James Lyons-Weiler Blog


California calls for pause of 330,000 doses, investigation after allergic reactions to Moderna vaccine batch – A cluster of allergic reactions prompted state officials to call for a pause of Moderna batch 041L20A


Tip of the Iceberg? Thousands of COVID Vaccine Injuries and 13 U.S. Deaths Reported in December Alone – In December, 3,916 COVID vaccine-related adverse events, including 13 deaths, were reported to VAERS. As more adverse events — ranging from life-threatening anaphylaxis to death — occur, it will be tougher to “sell” the experimental injections.


‘My throat started closing’: San Diego woman describes allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccine – “Brennan was one of up to ten people who had suspected allergic reactions after getting vaccines at Petco Park, the home of Major League Baseball’s San Diego Padres, last week. … Brennan said she’s allergic to shellfish.”


Pfizer vaccine gives Queensland health care worker an anaphylactic reaction


Four Australians suffer severe allergic reaction to AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine in the past 48 hours – The four Queenslanders had received AstraZeneca jab within the past two days – They suffered anaphylaxis after receiving the jab, health authorities revealed – Health officials have said reactions in people with allergies are to be expected – All four patients had a history of severe allergic reactions or anaphylaxis


Japan reports 47 anaphylaxis cases after 580,000 Pfizer vaccine shots – “The figure as of last Sunday implies an anaphylactic reaction rate of around 81 cases per million doses administered, much higher than five cases in every 1 million doses administered in the United States and 20 cases per million in Britain.”


Obituary: Kansas woman dies of allergic reaction after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine – EMS dispatch states the woman was having difficulty breathing and speaking when 911 was called – “In the obituary posted with Becker Dyer-Stanton Funeral Home, family members said 68-year-old Jeanie M. Evans, of Effingham, died unexpectedly on Wednesday at the Stormont-Vail Hospital after having a reaction to a COVID-19 vaccine. Emergency dispatch records note a patient had an allergic reaction at a vaccine clinic site just after 4 p.m. on Tuesday. Dispatch identified the patient as a 68-year-old female having difficulty breathing and speaking — adding that she had been injected with an EpiPen and that there were two nurses with her on the scene.”


P.E.I. woman hospitalized over ‘extremely rare’ COVID-19 vaccine allergy shares her story – Expert says getting COVID-19 itself is much worse than very low risk from vaccination – “The 32-year-old had no known allergies, but sometimes felt slightly unwell after annual flu shots, so staff at the King’s County Memorial Hospital in Montague, P.E.I., flagged her to wait 30 minutes after her Pfizer-BioNTech shot instead of the usual 15, to make sure she would be all right.”


Mother, 25, is put into intensive care coma after ‘very rare’ reaction to second Covid Pfizer jab caused terrifying anaphylactic shocks – Kirsty Hext, 25, has suffered 14 anaphylactic shocks since having vaccine – She also had a seizure and fractured her wrist, leg and cheekbone after falling – Carer is still in hospital after suffering the most recent anaphylactic shock


RE: Urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021 – “The Allergic responses to the vaccines comprised 25,270 reported ADRs, with 4 fatalities occurring among 1,001 people experiencing anaphylactic reactions.”


Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) for COVID-19 in Ontario: December 13, 2020 to June 5, 2021 – EVENTS MANAGED AS ANAPHYLAXIS There were 186 reports of events managed as anaphylaxis, in which 17 met the definition of a serious AEFI. Of all 186 reports of events managed as anaphylaxis: 164 received epinephrine, 163 were seen in the emergency department and 130 were fully recovered at the time of reporting. – Public Health Ontario


Three cases of vesiculobullous non-IgE-mediated cutaneous reactions to tozinameran (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) – “The Phase III trial of tozinameran, a ribonucleic acid (RNA) vaccine, demonstrated a risk of anaphylaxis at 11.1 cases per million doses1 . Little is known regarding various non-IgE-mediated cutaneous reactions arising from the use of these vaccines. We report three cases of non-IgE-mediated cutaneous reactions following tozinameran administration, in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.”


IgE-mediated allergy to polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a cause of anaphylaxis to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines


Kansas woman Jeanie Evans died of an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccine, autopsy shows – Topeka Capital-Journal


Maple Ridge woman compensated for mother’s death from COVID-19 vaccine – Frustrated by Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program – “Her mother had received a Moderna vaccine. Ten minutes later, she was having a hard time breathing. Soon she was unconscious. A nurse administered two EpiPens – one in a leg, and one in an arm, but they couldn’t save her. “She was gone in 15 minutes.” It had been a severe anaphylactic shock, despite the fact that she had never had an allergic reaction in the past. “I was stunned,” said DuPerron. “I couldn’t wrap my head around it.” – August 2022


EU adds severe allergies as side effect of Novavax COVID vaccine – Novavax stock fell 20.3% after news of severe side effects


Melton man (96) died after ‘extremely rare allergic reaction’ to Covid jab, inquest finds – A 96 year-old Melton man who collapsed and died within minutes of having the Pfizer Covid vaccine suffered a severe and extremely rare allergic reaction to the jab, an inquest heard.

 

 


Posted in News | Tags: allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, COVID-19, vaccine |

CBC Ignores Vaccine Science

27th February, 2020 · admin

On January 17, 2020 a CBC Marketplace program Marketplace: Inside the Anti-Vaccination Movement: Why more are falling for their dangerous message begins with host Asha Tomlinson stating, “The truth about vaccines starts now.”  Approximately 6 minutes in the following conversation happens:

Timothy Caulfield:  ……. This is what the science says.

Asha Tomlinson:  Let’s go through some of the claims. Allergies.

Timothy Caulfield:  No evidence to support it.”

This entire website, especially the science page, refutes this statement, and the taxpayer funded CBC doesn’t care – the CBC Ombudsman refuses to review my complaint, so I have posted the correspondence below, thread begins at the bottom of the page.    More on this story including responses from Del Bigtree and James Lyons-Weiler, PhD here.


Subject: Re: CBC Response to Marketplace January 17 broadcast
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:47:20 -0500
From: Rita Hoffman
To: CBC Ombud <ombud@cbc.ca>
CC: PAUL HAMBLETON <paul.hambleton@cbc.ca>, Jennifer McGuire <jennifer.mcguire@cbc.ca>

Dear Mr. Nagler,

I am not surprised that you will not be launching a formal review of my complaint.

Rita Hoffman


On 2020-02-27 9:58 a.m., CBC Ombud wrote:

Dear Ms. Hoffman,

You are asking journalists to provide proof because you have not accepted the views of an overwhelming majority of medical professionals and public health officials. That is not a realistic request from a journalist.

I fully support your right to question the medical consensus on vaccines, but a reporter is not engaged in propaganda or misinformation when they convey a view that is as widely held by experts as is the validity of vaccines.

I understand that there are a certain number of scientists who take an opposing view. There are also a certain number of scientists who question whether climate change is occurring, but there is a point at which – in both cases – the relative credibility of each position is small compared to the consensus view of people with expertise.  It is acceptable practice, for instance, for a reporter to say that the MMR vaccine is effective without having to qualify the statement or cite a study.

Mr. Hambleton has addressed the points you raised in your complaint. You may not like the answers he has given you, but that does not suggest any journalistic malpractice. It means simply that you disagree. If, over time, the scientific consensus shifts, then the expectation on journalists will shift as well. At this moment, though, I will not be launching a formal review of your complaint.

Sincerely,

Jack Nagler

CBC Ombudsman

ombud@cbc.ca

www.cbc.ca/ombudsman

On my website: Subscribe to reviews


On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:51 PM Rita Hoffman wrote:

Dear CBC Ombudsman,

While I thank Mr. Hambleton for his response, his reply (below) regarding the CBC Marketplace vaccination broadcast on vaccination is not acceptable and I am asking you to review this matter as many of the claims made in the January 17 broadcast remain unsupported by science.

Specifically, my requests for scientific proof of the “no evidence” for allergy and autoimmune links to vaccination in my original letter (pasted below) were not answered.

Also, please provide scientific proof of the statement by Katie Pedersen that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are “flushed out of your body within a couple of days”.   The quote from Dr. Crowcroft on plasma levels is not proof. 

Regarding James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, I am shocked that your response would say, “Let me emphasize that we accurately reported what he said.”  Anyone watching the original broadcast would know that is not the case.  I note the YouTube correction, but no apology to Dr. Lyons-Weiler. This is unacceptable.  CBC needs to publicly apologize for destroying the character of this scientist.

I look forward to hearing from the Ombudsman re: his review, and for the answers to my questions.

Thank you,

Rita Hoffman


On 2020-02-24 8:12 a.m., PAUL HAMBLETON wrote:

Dear Rita Hoffman:

I am writing in reply to your emails of January 29 addressed to CBC Ombudsman, Jack Nagler, concerning what you see as a number of “unsupported ‘facts’” in a story about the anti-vaccination movement broadcast on the January 17 edition of CBC Marketplace. Moreover, you asked that we respond to Dr. James Lyons-Weiler’s open letter demanding an apology and retraction for his treatment in the story.

As the Director of Journalistic Standards, Jennifer McGuire, General Manager and Editor in Chief of CBC News, asked me to reply to you directly.

I appreciate hearing your views and I sincerely regret that you are disappointed in CBC in this instance. However, I must tell you, respectfully, that your view – and Dr. Lyons-Weiler’s view – of the story’s shortcomings is not one I share. I’ll explain why, but first I want to be clear about the program and the focus of this story.

Marketplace, a multiple award-winning program of investigative journalism and one of CBC Television’s longest running current affairs programs, chiefly focuses on the interests of consumers. It looks at products, services, individuals and organizations that affect consumers – all from a consumer’s point of view. That was true in this case.

The focus of this story is on how the anti-vaccination movement has convinced consumers – often the parents of young children – that vaccines are dangerous. Vaccination is widely accepted by medical science and government health authorities as a safe and beneficial way to protect children from the potentially serious consequences of a range of sometimes deadly childhood diseases. Yet, in the face of what is commonly described as overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the anti-vaccination movement argues the risk is not in the disease, but in the vaccine given to prevent it. It would appear to be an unsustainable position, yet the influence of those worried about vaccination is growing along with their numbers.

Let me emphasize that this is not a story about the science of vaccination, or the way vaccines are made, or the companies that make them. If it was, you might reasonably expect it to weigh the evidence on all sides of the issue. But that is far beyond the rather narrow focus of this program. This program specifically examines why the anti-vaccine message is convincing to consumers, how it works, and why it is so easy for consumers to believe it.

Nevertheless, the program does present the views of a doctor, a scientist and a sceptic – Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Dr. James Lyons-Weller, and Del Bigtree – all key players in the anti-vaccine movement. They make clear their position that vaccines “cause autism;” have “destroyed the lives of countless children;” that “forced injections” should not be allowed; that vaccinations can cause allergies, auto-immune disease and seizures; that studies affirming the value of vaccines are “bad science … funded by people who make money off of selling vaccines;” and that children who get measles will benefit because they “will have a life-long immunity.”

An accompanying online story takes a closer look at the claims made by the movement under the headline, “Nearly half of Canadians are concerned about vaccine safety. Here’s why” (https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/anti-vaccine-myths-biases-1.5429845).

That said, the story rightly affirms the overwhelming consensus of the medical, scientific and public policy communities about the efficacy and safety of childhood vaccinations.

You suggested that it is inaccurate to say that vaccines do not cause allergies or autoimmune disease. You provided links to two web sites – “Deadly Allergy” and “Med Science Research” – which you wrote include studies saying the “exact opposite.”

The video story quotes anti-vaccine activists talking about vaccine caused injuries; among them, “allergies,” “autoimmune issues,” “spectrum autisms,” “eczema,” and “seizures.” Timothy Caulfield, a public health expert and author of The Vaccine Picture, a book debunking vaccine myths, replies to host Asha Tomlinson’s questions. “Allergies?” she asks. “No evidence,” he replies. “Auto-immune disease?” “No evidence.” “Seizures?” she asks. “There are rare risks where kids do have seizures,” he replies. “You have to remember that kids can get that kind of seizure from a variety of ailments.” And then Ms. Tomlinson added, “Fact: Side effects are very rare. For every million vaccinations – one to two severe allergic reactions.”

The CDC notes that any medication can cause a severe allergic reaction, “but such reactions from a vaccine are very rare, estimated at about one in a million doses.”

You wrote that in the accompanying Facebook question and answer panel, story producer Katie Pedersen said that “’they are not toxic exposures of these elements’ referring to the vaccine adjuvant aluminum.” She also said, you wrote that such adjuvants are “’flushed out of your body within a couple of days.’” You described both as “unsupported ‘facts.’”

Both statements were also included in the online story. That story said that vaccines contain chemicals that would be considered toxic at very high doses. But explained that’s also true for just about everything we interact with including water, which is toxic in large enough quantities. Yes, mercury is a neurotoxin and if consumed in large enough quantities over a long period of time can result in disease and death. However, the amount of mercury in vaccines, the story said, is in “very small, non-toxic quantities.”

Vaccines used thimerosal, mercury combined with a carboxylate group to make it soluble in water, as a bactericide. Thimerosal is also commonly used as a fungicide and to kill bacteria in an assortment of commonly used antiseptic ointments, sprays, creams and jellies, as well as in tattoo inks.

For comparison’s sake, the story noted, vaccines only ever contained 50 micrograms of thimerosal, which is equal to about 25 micrograms of mercury. That is about the same amount of mercury found in a three-ounce can of tuna.

Twenty years ago, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reviewed foods and drugs containing mercury and purely as a precaution, they said, asked drug companies to remove thimerosal.  Most vaccines now do not contain thimerosal.

The other common adjuvant, aluminum is the most abundant metal in the earth’s crust and occurs naturally in soil, water and air. In fact it’s so prevalent in food that the CDC estimates that the average adult in the United States eats 7-9 mg of aluminum every day. Antacids contain 104-208 mg of aluminum, buffered aspirin 10-20 mg per tablet.

It is also added in very small quantities to a few vaccines – chiefly those aimed at human papillomavirus (HPV), influenza, hepatitis and anthrax – but generally not to those given to children, including the MMR vaccine. For those few that do contain aluminum, they contain no more than 0.85 mg per dose – an amount 100 times smaller than in an antacid tablet – and in most cases they contain far less. 0.85 mg is about the same amount found in a litre of infant formula.

The segment went on to explain that adjuvants, such as aluminum, are added to some vaccines to enhance their effectiveness by “prompting the body to learn how to fight the disease instead of immediately flushing [the dead virus] out.”  And it added that “all traces” of aluminum and everything else in the vaccine are “are flushed completely out of the body within a day or two.”

I realize that there are some studies, often cited by those opposed to vaccination, that link aluminum adjuvants and their “biopersistence” to a wide range of afflictions sometimes described as the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), which is said to include macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF), the Gulf War syndrome (GWS), and “chronic toxicity” in infants, among other things.

Much of that science is hypothetical, not reproducible, and not highly regarded. On the other hand, there is overwhelming scientific and medical consensus on the safety and efficacy of vaccination. The story linked the section on aluminum adjuvants to a 2015 “Public Health Statement for Aluminum” issued by the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, a division of the CDC, that says “most” of the aluminum in food and “much of the small amount” that enters the blood stream is “quickly” excreted.

That seems to reflect the findings of most studies of the subject reviewed by our journalists. Among many others, we asked epidemiologist Dr. Natasha Crowcroft about aluminum. Dr. Crowcroft, who has authored over 250 peer-reviewed scientific papers, is the co-chair of the Canadian Association for Immunization Research, Evaluation and Education (CAIRE) and a member of the Canadian Immunization Research Network. She assured us that “kids who are vaccinated don’t have any increase in the aluminum levels in their plasma following immunization.”

She also notes that that although high levels of aluminum in the blood can pose health risks, vaccines generally bypass the bloodstream altogether. “You’re giving it into a muscle,” she said. “You’re not injecting a vaccine into a vein; you’re giving it into usually a muscle, sometimes subcutaneously.” She notes that because of this, “it doesn’t go straight into the bloodstream, it doesn’t accumulate in tissues, it stays in the site where the immune system can package it up and get rid of it and then if it gets into any other compartment it gets cleared through the kidneys. And it gets cleared quite quickly; it’s gone very quickly.”

She adds that the studies supporting “biopersistence” work off “an assumption that aluminum just stays there and builds up with each dose and all of that is just wrong. It doesn’t enter the blood stream, so it doesn’t ‘go up’ in levels the way that drugs do.”

You referred to Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and the letter he addressed to the CBC and posted on his web page alleging that he was misrepresented in the Marketplace story. He was not. But we did make an error transcribing what our own journalist said. I’ll explain what I mean.

Both the video story and an accompanying CBCNews.ca online story posted on January 17 under the headline, “Hidden cameras capture misinformation, fundraising tactics used by anti-vaxx movement” looked at how the anti-vaccination messaging is effective at encouraging doubt because of the way it manipulates emotions and biases.

One segment, the focus of your concern, looks briefly at how the movement raises money. Del Bigtree, a former television producer, controversial filmmaker and a prominent activist, and discredited researcher Andrew Wakefield charge thousands to speak at events and have raised millions to fund their cause.

Other figures associated with the movement, the online story said, find “workarounds,” such as Dr. Lyons-Weiler has. He said he is “just educating” and that he didn’t charge because it would make him an “international lobbyist.” The online story continued this way:

The original online story continued this way:

“So, what I would rather do is, I do a science day the day before,” he said. “I’d run an event where you … charge admission as per my website.”

“Sounds like a promo thing for you, a marketing thing for you,” said our journalist. “Now we’ve got a quid pro quo.” 

“That’s right,” he said, later detailing through an assistant that for a group of 400 people, he would want about $20 US per person, netting around $10,000 Cdn.

After reviewing the original tape, I can tell you that we made a transcription error in what our journalist said in that exchange. This is what our journalist said:

“Sounds like a promo thing for you, a marketing thing for you. That way it’s not a…. quid pro quo, I guess.” 

To which he responded, “That’s right…. exactly”

For the record, in the conversation at the time, our journalist then said: “That’s a dirty word, nowadays.”

Mr. Lyons-Weiler responded: “I don’t….Listen, if the worst thing I’m doing is talking with people about aluminum accumulation trends in children from vaccines…”

With respect to the video story, to be clear, Mr. Lyons-Weiler did not use the phrase, “No quid pro quo.” Again the subtitles for what our journalist said were not correct in that section. They should have read: “That way it’s not a…  quid pro quo, I guess”

We have corrected the subtitles on the broadcast piece, and we have also corrected the wording in the online story.  As well, we added the video of the full exchange to our Youtube story for transparency so you can watch it yourself.

Here is the link to the program episode on Youtube

You can see the updated online story here

Let me emphasize that we accurately reported what he said. The business arrangements he outlined speak for themselves. Whether they do or do not amount to a quid pro quo is not germane to the story. Readers and viewers can reach their own conclusions about that. Nevertheless, we did mis-transcribe the words of our own journalist and we should not have. We regret that error.

Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention, and for giving me an opportunity to respond. I hope my reply has assured you of the continuing integrity of Marketplace and CBC News.

Sincerely,

Paul

Paul Hambleton

Director of Journalistic Standards

CBC News

Cc. Jack Nagler, CBC Ombudsman

Jennifer McGuire, General Manager and Editor in Chief, CBC News


Subject: Marketplace: Inside the Anti-Vaccination Movement: Why more are falling for their dangerous message
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:21:16 -0500
From: Rita Hoffman
To: ombud@cbc.ca

Dear Mr. Nagler CBC Ombudsman,

I am writing to you regarding the January 17, 2020 program Marketplace: Inside the Anti-Vaccination Movement: Why more are falling for their dangerous message.

The program begins with host Asha Tomlinson stating, “The truth about vaccines starts now.”

Approximately 6 minutes in the following conversation happens:

Timothy Caulfield:  ……. This is what the science says.

Asha Tomlinson:  Let’s go through some of the claims. Allergies.

Timothy Caulfield:  No evidence to support it.

Asha Tomlinson:  Autoimmune Disease.

Timothy Caulfield:  No evidence.

Due to the lack of evidence provided during the program, I am requesting that Marketplace provide an extensive list of peer-reviewed, documented, scientific proof of the above claim that there is “no evidence” of the vaccine/allergy connection.  Studies of authors with conflict of interest or who receive pharmaceutical funding are not acceptable proof.

I have found the exact opposite in my investigations into vaccination and allergies: https://deadlyallergy.com/science/

I am requesting that Marketplace provide an extensive list of peer-reviewed, documented, scientific proof of the above claim that there is “no evidence” of the vaccine/autoimmunity connection. Studies of authors with conflict of interest or who receive pharmaceutical funding are not acceptable proof.

Regarding the link between autoimmune disease and vaccination, the website MedScience Research has compiled the following studies indicating a connection: https://medscienceresearch.com/autoimmunity/

Regarding this video – CBC Marketplace Twitter “Vaccine Q & A Doctor answers your question at https://twitter.com/cbcmarketplace/status/1219287740228894720

In the Q & A link above, Producer Katie Pedersen states “they are not toxic exposures of these elements”. Regarding the vaccine adjuvant aluminum, I am requesting that Marketplace provide peer-reviewed, documented, scientific proof of this claim.  Studies of authors with conflict of interest or who receive pharmaceutical funding are not acceptable proof.

Also, please provide scientific proof of the statement by Katie Pedersen that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are “flushed out of your body within a couple of days”. 

MedScience Research has compiled studies showing the dangers of injecting aluminum: https://medscienceresearch.com/aluminum/  as well as the work of UK Professor Christopher Exley:  https://www.hippocraticpost.com/author/professor-chris-exley/

The above are only a few of the unsupported “facts” from these broadcasts.

I also look forward to the CBC’s response to James Lyons-Weiler Phd’s letter, “Scientist Demands Apology and Retraction from CBC’s Marketplace” found at his blog here: https://jameslyonsweiler.com  This letter, and his other blog posts regarding the Marketplace program need to be answered and addressed and I await a public response from the CBC and/or Marketplace.

Sincerely,

Rita Hoffman

Posted in News | Tags: CBC Marketplace, CBC Ombudsman, James Lyons-Weiler PhD, vaccine science |

Search This Site

Pages

  • News
  • Science
  • Resources
    • Airborne / Contact Allergy
    • They know …..
    • Iatrogenesis
  • History
  • Treatments
  • PENTA Project
  • Contact Us

Recent Posts

  • COVID-19 Vaccine
  • CBC Ignores Vaccine Science
  • Vaccines contain food proteins
  • Influenza allergy?
  • What about peanut oil in vaccines?
  • PENTA Vaccine Letter
  • Deadly food allergies and organ donation
  • PENTA Cover-Up at CBC
  • Vaccines cause the development of food allergies: the latest evidence

Twitter

Follow @vaccinerisk

Pages

  • News
  • Science
  • Resources
    • Airborne / Contact Allergy
    • They know …..
    • Iatrogenesis
  • History
  • Treatments
  • PENTA Project
  • Contact Us

Archives

  • December 2020
  • February 2020
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • July 2016

Categories

  • News (2)
  • PENTA Project (2)
  • Resources (1)
  • Uncategorized (4)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress
© A WordPress Site
  • News
  • Science
  • Resources
  • History
  • Treatments
  • PENTA Project
  • Contact Us